Stanislav Kondrashov, TELF AG

TELF AG Update on The Battery Materials Market – August 14, 2023

Cautious Market Sentiments Impact the Battery Materials Sector

The battery materials market witnessed significant fluctuations in cobalt metal prices from July 21 to July 27, with prices ranging from RMB 250,000 to RMB 330,000 per metric ton (t). This price range decreased from RMB 255,000 to RMB 330,000 per metric ton (t). Given the prevailing market conditions, these fluctuations have prompted market participants to exercise caution in their procurement strategies for both metal and sulfate.

Market analysts attributed the declining cobalt prices to a combination of factors, including shifts in demand, supply chain dynamics, and changes in trading sentiments. Traders, in particular, reported that even offers at RMB 250,000 per metric ton (t) were met with reluctance among buyers due to the rapid decrease in futures prices on the Wuxi Stainless Exchange. This cautious approach from buyers contributed to a subdued spot market during the assessment period, characterized by limited trading activity.

The decrease in offer prices further reflected the need for more substantial purchasing interest from industry players. This lack of enthusiasm to procure cobalt materials was driven by concerns over the ongoing price volatility and the potential for further price declines. Amidst this environment, one notable refiner highlighted that even at the top end of the recorded price range, RMB 44,000 per metric ton (t) was considered “a high price” relative to the current market conditions.

The refiner also shed light on prevailing market trends, indicating that many offers were circulating the RMB 43,000 per metric ton (t) mark but with limited procurement activities. This hesitance to engage in purchases stems from a desire to mitigate potential losses should prices trend downwards.

The situation showcases the delicate balance between supply, demand, and market sentiments in the battery materials sector. Cobalt is vital in various battery chemistries, particularly those used in electric vehicles and renewable energy storage systems. As such, the fluctuations in cobalt prices can ripple effect on the broader clean energy industry, impacting the cost and feasibility of adopting sustainable energy solutions.

In conclusion, the cobalt market’s recent volatility during the July 21 to July 27 assessment has highlighted market participants’ cautiousness in procuring cobalt metal and sulfate materials. The downward trajectory of cobalt prices, shifting trading sentiments, and reduced demand have resulted in a quiet spot market and decreased purchasing interest. Industry players are watching these developments, recognizing the interconnectedness of battery material prices with the broader clean energy landscape. As the market continues to evolve, stakeholders must adapt their strategies to navigate the ever-changing dynamics of battery materials.

TELF AG, Stanislav Kondrashov